Although demand avoidance, including the use of social strategies to avoid demands, is widely acknowledged as a characteristic reported by and observed in some people, no research has found strong evidence for the group of traits proposed for PDA or tested the validity or usefulness of Newson’s theory in clinical practice. The proposed core characteristics most commonly cited are: resisting and avoiding the ‘ordinary demands of life’ using social strategies as forms of resistance – for example, distraction, giving excuses. Some critics note that there is not enough research evidence to confirm PDA as a separate condition to autism and argue that: the complex characteristics can instead be understood by considering the individual’s social, sensory and cognitive sensitivities, any co-occurring conditions and whether their environment is suited to their needs. It has also been argued that the PDA label represents an unnecessary pathologising of differences in autistic people when: they act outside of social norms in attempt to gain autonomy. There is debate around how the characteristic of a persistent and marked resistance to demands relates to autism. PDA is not clinically recognised, which means you cannot receive a standalone diagnosis of PDA. Although it is not possible to receive a diagnosis of PDA, some people have a diagnosis of autism with a 'demand avoidant profile’ or a ‘PDA profile’ noted, and others self-identify with the PDA label.