Is positive reinforcement good or bad?
Freeda Pollich
2025-06-23 02:11:43
Count answers: 9
Procedures classified as positive reinforcement are generally regarded as more desirable than those classified as aversive—those that involve negative reinforcement or punishment. Theoretically, the distinction between positive and negative reinforcement has proven difficult. When the distinction is made purely in operational terms, experiments reveal that positive reinforcement has aversive functions. On a practical level, positive reinforcement can lead to deleterious effects, and it is implicated in a range of personal and societal problems. These issues challenge us to identify other criteria for judging behavioral procedures.
Natalia Bruen
2025-06-23 01:32:27
Count answers: 8
Positive reinforcement is immediately rewarding good/desired behavior shown by children, thus causing an increase in that desired behavior. Different teachers offer different positive reinforcements, like tangibles, edibles, and tokens, amongst others. There is some effectiveness in these tools when used appropriately and consistently. However, there is a downside to positive reinforcement, that can leave a negative impact. Often in the classroom, good job is being expressed to a child after they’ve completed a task, which ends up making the child believe they then need adult approval. While positive reinforcement can be very effective, it’s important to keep in mind that each child responds differently and one reward may benefit the child over another one.
Read also
- Is giving treats positive reinforcement?
- Is it better to train dogs with treats or praise?
- Is giving a dog a treat positive reinforcement?
- Are treats good for training dogs?
- When to stop training with treats?
- Is it better to train dogs without treats?
- What is negative punishment in dog training?
- What is the best negative reinforcement for dogs?
- What are the cons of positive reinforcement in animals?